Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 2878 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - $59.4 vs $153.17
- Up to 39% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 4600G - $0.39 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than Core i3-3220T - 203 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
75.86206896551724%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
60.9375%
Price, $
$153.17
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
29.09783989834816%
Multi-Core
941
15.358250367227027%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |