Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220T is 189 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-6200 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $42.85 vs $80.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-3220T - $0.23 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |