Buy on Amazon
$80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 605 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220T - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $41.13 vs $80.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220T - $0.23 vs $0.48 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
