Buy on Amazon
$80
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3220T - 145 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $39.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3220T - $0.27 vs $0.56 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
