Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $42.85 vs $89.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10105T - $0.37 vs $0.74 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
50%
Price, $
$89.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13396 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |