Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G6950 - 252 vs 218 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 35 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $47.48 vs $89.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10105T - $0.22 vs $0.36 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
61%
Price, $
$89.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13969 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
218
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |