Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3930T - 202 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $39.0 vs $89.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105T - $0.2 vs $0.45 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
44%
Price, $
$89.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13579 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |