Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F and the more expensive Core i3-10105T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10105T - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $85.13 vs $89.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10105T - $0.51 vs $0.55 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11439 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |