Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 417 vs 403 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $98.18 vs $109.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.24 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
417
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
88%
Price, $
$109.99
89%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |