Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1293 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 250 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
80.33012379642366%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |