Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 172 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $79.23 vs $89.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-10105T - $0.5 vs $0.52 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
96%
Price, $
$89.99
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10878 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10875 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |