Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105T outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105T is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8300 - $89.99 vs $112.02
- Up to 24% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - $0.57 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13734 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |