Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4130 - 273 vs 267 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $41.13 vs $89.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105T - $0.15 vs $0.33 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
45%
Price, $
$89.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14497 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
267
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |