Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 81% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1820 - 177 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $46.41 vs $89.99
- Up to 8% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i3-10105T - $0.47 vs $0.51 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
92%
Price, $
$89.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14399 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
98
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |