Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 477 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Celeron 3205U - 271 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |