Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1285 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Athlon 200GE - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron 3205U - 194 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |