Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2501 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron 3205U - 179 vs 154 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |