Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1129 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 15 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Celeron 3205U - 215 vs 211 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |