Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 909 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 37% better in League of Legends than Phenom II X4 830 - 52 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |