Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2681 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Phenom II X4 830 - 79 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |