Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1189 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 31% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Phenom II X4 830 - 38 vs 29 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
