Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1983 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $100.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 35% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.67 vs $2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 23% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6350 - 74 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
64%
Price, $
$189.95
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |