Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1620 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $100.0 vs $208.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-8700K - $0.53 vs $1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6350 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5865 minutes ago
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |