Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3262 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $100.0 vs $177.89
- Up to 26% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5700X - $1.1 vs $1.48 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - 120 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5039 minutes ago
Buy for $177.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |