Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 365 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $100.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-3770K - $0.17 vs $0.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 4% better in Minecraft than FX-6350 - 627 vs 603 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5661 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |