Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1750 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $99.99 vs $135.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 53 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |