Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $100.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-11600K - $0.82 vs $1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 43% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6350 - 174 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5860 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
79%
Price, $
$179.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |