Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K and the cheaper Core i3-10105 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-10105 - 561 vs 536 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $84.99 vs $179.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-11600K - $0.16 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
561
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
50%
Price, $
$179.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
536
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |