Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 42% better in Rust than Core i7-3770 - 231 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $122.03 vs $179.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - $0.75 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
96%
Price, $
$179.99
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
163
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |