Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2085 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than Core i7-6700 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $129.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - $0.68 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
87%
Price, $
$179.99
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |