Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $122.03 vs $124.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - 181 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - $0.69 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3613 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3614 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |