Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1816 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - 537 vs 448 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than FX-6350 - $99.97 vs $100.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - $0.19 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8323 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
537
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |