Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3906 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $100.0 vs $229.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-14400 - $0.47 vs $0.95 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than FX-6350 - 242 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5328 minutes ago
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |