Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 14% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8300 - 145 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $112.02 vs $229.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-14400 - $0.88 vs $1.59 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11687 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |