Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $150.0 vs $692.1
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.83 vs $3.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
21%
Price, $
$692.1
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $692.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |