Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $140.0 vs $488.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 139 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Buy for $488 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
37.10144927536232%
Multi-Core
4841
22.172857600879404%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |