Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Core i5-11400F - 87 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $115.98 vs $589.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900KS - $1.73 vs $6.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.78/FPS
25%
Price, $
$589.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
67
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |