Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1840 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $197.65 vs $530.97
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900KF - $1.53 vs $3.2 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 166 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.2/FPS
47%
Price, $
$530.97
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |