Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2007 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $85.76 vs $530.97
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.84 vs $3.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 139 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
102
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.82/FPS
21%
Price, $
$530.97
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |