Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 16 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G4900 - 169 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $68.02 vs $85.76
- Up to 20% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.41 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9051 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
164
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |