Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $85.76 vs $529.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900F - $0.67 vs $3.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 23% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 158 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.35/FPS
20%
Price, $
$529.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |