Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-12400 - 237 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $155.86 vs $528.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-14900F - $0.75 vs $2.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
33%
Price, $
$528.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |