Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-12600KF - 140 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $159.14 vs $528.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - $1.2 vs $3.78 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
31%
Price, $
$528.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $159.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |