Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $42.85 vs $143.7
- Up to 65% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-10600K - $0.19 vs $0.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 266 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14123 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
35%
Price, $
$143.7
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |