Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1610 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $37.0 vs $141.45
- Up to 72% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-10600K - $0.22 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
28%
Price, $
$141.45
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $141.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |