Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3240 - 219 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $41.0 vs $143.7
- Up to 71% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10600K - $0.19 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
28%
Price, $
$143.7
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19376 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |