Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-4130 - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $41.13 vs $141.45
- Up to 70% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-10600K - $0.34 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
29%
Price, $
$141.45
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $141.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
120
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |