Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2410 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $42.85 vs $188.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.24 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6200 - 205 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
26%
Price, $
$188.95
22%
FPS Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Zambezi | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
