Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2687 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $42.85 vs $205.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.24 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6200 - 226 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6897 minutes ago
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |