Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3974 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $42.85 vs $189.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.29 vs $0.91 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 39% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6200 - 208 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7127 minutes ago
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |