Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2243 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $42.85 vs $210.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 2700X - $1.95 vs $4.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 114% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6200 - 47 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6990 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6991 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |